Site icon

Always Assume Competence

This is something that was talked about a lot in my training and even more so in my internship. In my internship, I worked with many students who were very limited in their responses to their environment due to communication, physical, and other deficits. Many children that this applies to have multiple disabilities, may not be able to communicate currently, and may “look” like they function at the level of a 2-6 month old. However, we were always taught that we assume the client is at the functioning level of their chronological age, unless we have significant evidence to prove otherwise. 

For instance, talking to a teenage client with a TBI like they are a child can severely hamper your clients self-esteem, motivation, competence, and the therapeutic relationship. Something I think that is not talked about enough is the emotional support for clients who are severely limited in their ability to engage with the environment. As their therapist, it is your responsibility to take this into account, even if you are only working on physical, communication, or cognitive skills. These clients still have an internal world that is rich with emotions and experiences.

Some questions to ask yourself:

Although these clients may present at a much lower level of functioning, oftentimes assessments are unable to determine cognitive levels due to the limitations in assessment instruments. We want to be sure we are supporting the client as much as possible and this requires us to assume competence at its highest level.

What are your thoughts?

Exit mobile version